Cases 1 - 10 of 100
QUINLAN et al v. KENNEDY
as 1:2026cv01493
Plaintiff:
HEATHER QUINLAN, JESSICA GRANGER, TERRY SHAFER and others
Defendant:
ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Lashbrooks v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2025cv01661
Plaintiff:
Brandi Faith Lashbrooks
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Maurice Chew-Bey v. Jacqueline Lashbrook, et al
as 25-2399
Plaintiff:
MAURICE CHEW-BEY
Defendant:
JACQUELINE LASHBROOK and JOHN BALDWIN
Jessica Riley v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2025cv01577
Plaintiff:
Jessica Riley
Defendant:
County of San Bernardino, Deputy M. Placencia, Deputy B. Tizzard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LASHBROOK v. LIFECELL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv10210
Defendant:
ALLERGAN USA, INC. and LIFECELL CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
RONNI LASHBROOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stanley Boclair v. Jacqueline Lashbrook, et al
as 24-1539
Plaintiff:
STANLEY BOCLAIR
Defendant:
JACQUELINE LASHBROOK, JOHN R. BALDWIN, BARRY MYERS and others
Diamonds Direct v. Manly Bands et al
as 2:2023cv00870
Plaintiff:
Diamonds Direct doing business as Lashbrook
Defendant:
Manly Bands, Johnathan Ruggiero, Michelle Luchese and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Travis Weston v. John Baldwin, et al
as 23-2804
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRAVIS D. WESTON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN BALDWIN, JACQUELINE LASHBROOK, FRANK LAWRENCE and others
Stanley Boclair v. Jacqueline Lashbrook, et al
as 23-2602
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STANLEY BOCLAIR
Defendant / Appellee:
JACQUELINE LASHBROOK, JOHN R. BALDWIN, BARRY MYERS and others
Stanley Boclair v. Jacqueline Lashbrook, et al
as 23-1978
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STANLEY BOCLAIR
Defendant / Appellee:
JACQUELINE LASHBROOK, JOHN R. BALDWIN, BARRY MYERS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
