Lewis et al v. Secret Service et al
| James D Lewis, F.B.I., Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Ted Cruz |
| Secret Service, U.S. Homeland Security, Bruce Rauner, Edward Snowden and Unknown Party |
| 3:2016cv00970 |
| August 29, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Lee |
| Staci M. Yandle |
| Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice as a sanction against Plaintiff for failing to disclose his litigation his tory to the Court, including the assessment of any "strikes" under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). This dismissal shall NOT count as another "strike" under § 1915(g). Plaintiff's obligation to pay the filin g fee for this action was incurred at the time the action was filed, so the filing fee of $400.00 remains due and payable. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff James D. Lewis, # B-52327, is hereby RESTRICTED from filing any new civil actions in this Court until such time as his outstanding filing fees of $1,352.59 have been paid in full; this amount includes the $400.00 filing fee for this action. Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 10/11/2016. (tjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
