Cases 1 - 10 of 412
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Robert Decker v. Lilita Infante, et al
as 24-1334
Plaintiff:
ROBERT K. DECKER
Defendant:
LILITA INFANTE, D.E.A. Special Agent, JASON HAYES, Task Force Officer, aka Jason Heyes, RAPHAEL GARCIA, U.S. Postal Inspector Service and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552 Freedom of Information Act
(PC) Black v. United States et al
as 2:2024cv00811
Plaintiff:
Siva D. Black
Defendant:
United States, C.I.A., Drug Enforcement Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schneider v. F.B.I. agent(s)
as 24-908
Plaintiff:
LUCAS CANTON SCHNEIDER
Defendant:
Unknown named F.B.I. AGENT(S)
Robert Decker v. Lilita Infante, et al
as 24-1077
Plaintiff:
ROBERT K. DECKER
Defendant:
LILITA INFANTE, D.E.A. Special Agent, JASON HAYES, T.F.O., aka Jason Heyes, RAPHAEL GARCIA, U.S.P.I.S. Inspector and others
(PC) Woodruff v. The White House et al
as 2:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Earnest Tomboura Woodruff
Defendant:
The White House, United States Secret Service, Intelligence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
