Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Hayes v. United States of America, et al
as 26-2025
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. HAYES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, F.B.I. AGENT CHRISTOPHER STEFFEN and others
Stephan Byrd et al v.Warden Lepe et al
as 5:2026cv04312
Plaintiff:
Stephan R Byrd, Jeremy Rogers, ODean Thompson and others
Defendant:
Warden Lepe, Bureau of Prisons, Captain Gore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kent G. Lehman v. F.B.I.
as 8:2026cv01960
Plaintiff:
Kent G. Lehman
Defendant:
F.B.I.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Devonish v. Unknown Agents of F.B.I. Louisville Office et al
as 3:2026cv00541
Plaintiff:
Omar Devonish
Defendant:
Unknown Agents of F.B.I. Louisville Office and F.B.I.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Hamby v. F.B.I. Agents
as 1:2026cv00077
Plaintiff:
William D. Hamby, Jr.
Defendant:
F.B.I. Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allison v. F.B.I. et al
as 2:2026cv01676
Plaintiff:
Ronald J Allison
Defendant:
F.B.I. and Federal Authorities
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haines-Wilson v. Camp Pendleton Deens ID Officer et al
as 3:2026cv03253
Plaintiff:
Victoria Leigh Haines-Wilson
Defendant:
Camp Pendleton Deens ID Officer, Navy, F.B.I. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
TATE-ANDERSON v. F.B.I. et al
as 2:2026cv03046
Plaintiff:
KEVIN TATE-ANDERSON
Defendant:
F.B.I., PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPT. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Johnson v. Department of Justice et al
as 6:2026cv01442
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Johnson
Defendant:
Department of Justice and F.B.I.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
