Malone v. IDOC et al
| William A Malone |
| IDOC, Wexler Health Care Services Corporation, C/O Bailey, C/O Winberry and Cliff W. Vanzandt |
| 3:2016cv00978 |
| August 29, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Perry |
| Michael J. Reagan |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice, based on Plaintiff's failure to comply with two Orders of this Court (see Docs. 7, 9). Further, this dismissal shall count as one of Plaintiff's three allotted strikes within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 12/8/2016. (tjk)
|
|
Filing
7
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that COUNTS 10 and 12 are DISMISSED without prejudice, and COUNT 11 is DISMISSED with prejudice, all for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. If he would like to revive Counts 10 or 12, Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to file a First Amended Complaint in this case on or before November 21, 2016. Should Plaintiff fail to file his First Amended Complaint within the allotted time, dismissal of this action will become with prejudice. (Amended Pleadings due by 11/21/2016). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 10/17/2016. (tjk)
|
|
Filing
1
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER severing case number 16-200-SMY. Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 8/29/2016. (tjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
