Godfrey v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
| Charles Godfrey |
| Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Unknown Party, Michael Scott, Christine Brown, Warden Lashbrooks, Officer Redding, M Scott and C/O Soloan |
| 3:2017cv00157 |
| February 14, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Perry |
| Nancy J. Rosenstengel |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
ORDER granting 85 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to enter judgment in favor of Randall Redding and Hiram Sloan on Godfreys Eighth Amendment claim for deliberate indifference in Count 1. Plaintiff Charles Godfrey shall recover nothing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gilbert C. Sison on 1/28/2020. (klh)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER ADOPTING 38 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court GRANTS the 27 Motion for Summary Judgment for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies filed by Wexford Health Sources, Inc. Wexford is DISMISSED without prejudice. The only claim remaining is Count 1 asserted against Officer Redding and C/O Soloan. Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 7/10/2018. (bak)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson. Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 3/31/2017. (tjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
