Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Godfrey v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv02311
Plaintiff:
Mark Charles Godfrey
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0402 Social Security Benefits
BWATETE et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv03149
Plaintiff:
CHARLES GODFREY BWATETE, TOMAS BWEBALE, GODFREY BWENGYERERE and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bwatete et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02732
Plaintiff:
Charles Godfrey Bwatete, Tomas Bwebale, Godfrey Bwengyerere and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
GODFREY v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2021cv01005
Petitioner:
LAWRENCE CHARLES GODFREY
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Godfrey v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00917
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Mark Charles Godfrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id
Mack Transou v. Charles Godfrey, et al
as 19-5026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MACK T. TRANSOU
Defendant / Appellee:
SEAN BRANTLEY, CHARLES GODFREY and THOMAS J. LIMBIRD, individuals and Godfrey terminated capacity
Transou v. Godfrey et al
as 1:2018cv00080
Plaintiff:
Mack T. Transou
Defendant:
Doctor (f/n/u) Limbird, Sean Brantley and Charles Godfrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Godfrey v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00157
Plaintiff:
Charles Godfrey
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Unknown Party, Michael Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Godfrey v. Cantina Food Services et al
as 3:2015cv00455
Plaintiff:
Charles Godfrey
Defendant:
Thomas Spiller, Suzann Bailey and Ty Bates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson v. Godfrey, et al.
as 3:2014cv00666
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Lawson
Defendant:
Charles Godfrey and Eric Mericle, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
