Wallace v. Baldwin et al
Plaintiff: Maurice L. Wallace
Defendant: John Baldwin, Kimberly Butler, Mike Atchison, John/Jane Doe and IDOC
Case Number: 3:2017cv00576
Filed: June 1, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Office: East St. Louis Office
County: Randolph
Presiding Judge: David R. Herndon
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 28, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 364 ORDER re 352 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney / MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL, AND/OR FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A GUARDIAN AD LITEM filed by Maurice L. Wallace: As provided in the attached Order, Dr. David Rakofsky, clinical psychologist, is appointed to examine Plaintiff Maurice Wallace. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to transmit a copy of this Order to the Warden of Lawrence Correctional Center and to the Litigation Coordinator for Lawrence Correctional Center. The Court further DIRECTS the Clerk to transmit a copy of this Order to Dr. Rakofsky. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 3/28/2024. (dsw)
February 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 310 ORDER: As explained in this Order, the IDOC Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 280 is GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART. Summary judgment is GRANTED as to all Defendants named in Claims 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6. This resolves all claims again st Defendants Hinton and Williams, so the Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate them, and to enter judgment in their favor at the close of the case. Claim 3 will proceed against Defendants Simmons, Eilers, Lawrence, Lashbrook, Butler, Schoenbeck, Hart, and Walker, but summary judgment will be GRANTED as to Defendants Jeffreys, Jones, Rathke, Hill, Westfall and Goldman on Claim 3. Claim 3 against Defendant Mueller is dismissed per Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1), and the Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate Muelle r. Further details are contained in this Order. Defendants' Motion to Strike 301 is DENIED, and Plaintiff's Motion for a Hearing 304 is also DENIED. The case will be set for a status conference by separate order. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 2/20/2023. (kgk)
February 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 220 ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 170 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 2/18/2021. (bps)
October 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 175 ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal is GRANTED in part. Plaintiff is granted leave to file proposed Exhibit B under seal. On or before October 23, 2020, Plaintiff shall submit to the Court's proposed documents e-mail acco unt a copy of Exhibit A for in camera review. On or before October 26, 2020, the parties shall SHOW CAUSE why the Court should not order a redacted copy of Exhibit B to be publicly filed. Upon receipt and inspection of proposed Exhibit A, the Court will schedule a hearing onthe Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 10/19/20. (bps)
December 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams. Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 12/7/2018. (tjk)
July 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the request for issuance of a temporary restraining order in Plaintiffs Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 8) is DENIED. This Court RESERVES a decision on th e Motion (Doc. 8) to the extent it requests a preliminary injunction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 6) is DENIED. Plaintiff shall pay the full filing fee of $400.00 for this action within thirty (30) days of the date of entry of this Order (on or before August 4, 2017). If Plaintiff fails to comply with this Order in the time allotted by the Court, this case will be dismissed. Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 7/5/2017. (tkm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wallace v. Baldwin et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maurice L. Wallace
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Baldwin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kimberly Butler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mike Atchison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John/Jane Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: IDOC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?