Patterson v. Johnson et al
| Ricky Patterson |
| D. Johnson, Warden Lamb, M. McCarthy, Sgt Casburn, L. McCarthy, Stibbrr, Henton, E. Cooper, Goodrum, Buckles, Summer, C/O Givens, J Baldwin, Dave While and Counselor Ray |
| 3:2017cv01067 |
| October 4, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Lawrence |
| Michael J. Reagan |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
ORDER GRANTING 72 MOTION to Relieve Counsel of Duties and DENYING 73 MOTION to Withdraw Settlement Agreement. Attorneys David Grebel and Patrick Hamacher are TERMINATED as counsel of record for Plaintiff. On behalf of the entire Southern Distric t of Illinois, the undersigned sincerely thanks Mr. Grebel and Mr. Hamacher for their time and service on this case. In accordance with the Order entered on February 21, 2020, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment and close this case on the Courts docket. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty on 5/28/2020. (jmj)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 20(a)(2), Plaintiff's due process and retaliation claims in COUNTS 4 and 6, and the retaliation and Eighth Amendment claims in COUNTS 9 and 10, are SEVERED into 2 new cases. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 12/5/2017. (tjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
