Cases 1 - 10 of 100
NORTON et al v. GOODRUM et al
as 4:2026cv00218
Plaintiff:
ROGER SEAN NORTON and AMANDA JOYCE NORTON
Defendant:
SHERRY GOODRUM, MICHAEL SMITH, JUDGE ROBERT POYDASHEFF, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goodrum v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated
as 1:2026cv00020
Plaintiff:
Tony Goodrum
Defendant:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Goodrum v. Northern Nevada Corr. Center
as 3:2025cv00774
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Goodrum
Defendant:
Northern Nevada Corr. Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter Marine Group v. Gonzalez
as 25-20584
Plaintiff:
Hunter Marine Group, L.L.C., as owner pro hac vice of the M/V MS Adalyn and Michael Quain Neward Pittman, as owner of the M/V MS Adalyn
Claimant:
Marin Gonzalez, Guillermo Cano Rivera, Matthew Crawford and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv07022
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Goodrum v. Northern Nevada Correctional Center et al
as 3:2025cv00414
Petitioner:
Mitchell Keith Goodrum
Respondent:
Northern Nevada Correctional Center, Henley, State of Nevada and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00819
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 25-2364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Goodrum et al v. Veradigm, Inc.
as 1:2025cv07062
Plaintiff:
Tony Goodrum, Marty Wooley, Todd Clay and others
Defendant:
Veradigm, Inc.
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2025cv02105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
