Towns v. Menard Correctional Center et al
| Dwayne Towns |
| Jacqueline Lashbrook, Menard Correctional Center and M. Siddiqui |
| 3:2018cv01455 |
| July 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Randolph |
| Michael J Reagan |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 RESPONSE, affidavit and exhibits to #4 Order filed by Dwayne Towns. (jaj) |
Filing 4
ORDER: Plaintiff is ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE within 30 days of the date of this Order (on or before October 9, 2018) why his IFP Motion should not be denied and/or this case dismissed based on his failure to disclose material financial information in his IFP Motion, including funds he received between July 30, 2017 and July 30, 2018 from third parties and/or pursuant to settlement agreement. (Action due by 10/9/2018). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 9/7/2018. (tjk)
|
| Filing 3 Letter from USDC/SDIL to Plaintiff informing him of case number. (Attachments: #1 Consent to Magistrate Judge) (jaj) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Dwayne Towns. (jaj) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Dwayne Towns.(jaj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
