Cases 1 - 10 of 127
Davenport v. Baker et al
as 3:2024cv00852
Plaintiff:
Kareem Davenport
Defendant:
Sergeant Baker, C/O Suhro, C/O Schweizer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nellem v. Menard Correctional Center et al
as 3:2024cv00539
Plaintiff:
Dartrell Nellem
Defendant:
Menard Correctional Center, Anthony Wills and C/O Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kimes v. Lawrenceville Hospital et al
as 3:2023cv03879
Plaintiff:
Luther Kimes
Defendant:
Lawrenceville Hospital, Lawrence Correctional Facility and Menard Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Menard Correctional Center
as 3:2023cv03360
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Johnson
Defendant:
Menard Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cutler v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv03127
Plaintiff:
Chad Cutler
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Menard Correctional Center, Illinois Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Massal v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00502
Petitioner:
Kareem Massal
Respondent:
Menard Correctional Center Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. Warden
as 3:2022cv01853
Plaintiff:
John Adams
Defendant:
Warden, Menard Correctional Center, IDOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruiz v. Doe et al
as 3:2022cv01382
Plaintiff:
Abel Ruiz
Defendant:
John Doe, C/O Fenton, C/O Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Buettner et al
as 3:2022cv01250
Plaintiff:
Lemuel Houston
Defendant:
Ms. Buettner, Bryan Childs, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Croom v. Doe #6 et al
as 3:2022cv01244
Plaintiff:
Christopher Croom
Defendant:
John Doe #6, John Doe #7, John Doe #8 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
