Glover v. Werlich
| Michael Glover |
| Warden Werlich |
| 3:2018cv01818 |
| October 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Clifford J Proud |
| Nancy J Rosenstengel |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Petition, good cause having been shown. Respondent shall file his answer or other response on or before January 17, 2019. Response due by 1/17/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud on 12/3/2018. (beb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Warden Werlich. (Hoell, Christopher) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF REFERRAL: Upon consent of parties case transferred to Judge Clifford J. Proud for final disposition. Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel no longer assigned to the case. (kdb) |
| Filing 8 FINAL CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Hoell, Christopher) Modified on 11/19/2018 (kdb). |
| Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE Executed on Habeas Corpus Acknowledgement Letter by Warden Werlich. Warden Werlich served on 11/2/2018, answer due 12/3/2018. (Hoell, Christopher) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher R. Hoell on behalf of Warden Werlich (Hoell, Christopher) |
| Filing 5 Letter to AUSA constituting service. (tjk) |
|
Filing 4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent Werlich shall answer or otherwise plead within on or before December 3, 2018). This preliminary order to respond does not, of course, preclude the Government from raising any objection or defense it may wish to present. Service upon the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Illinois, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, Illinois, shall constitute sufficient service. Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 10/31/2018. (tjk)
|
| Filing 3 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (tkm) |
| Habeas Corpus Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 34625087536. (cjo) |
| Filing 2 Letter to petitioner regarding case opening. (Attachments: #1 Consent to Magistrate Judge, #2 Motion and Affidavit to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs) (tkm) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Michael Glover.(tkm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Glover v. Werlich | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden Werlich | |
| Represented By: | Christopher R. Hoell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Michael Glover | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
