Taplin, Jr. v. Watson et al
| Enos F. Taplin, Jr. |
| J. Loche, Price, Counselor Inbaden, Counselor Vasquez, Dee Dee Brookhart, Counselor Rawald, Jaqulen Lashbrook, J. Dye, Camron Watson, Lieutenant Hitchens, Officer Delany, Lieutenant Priddy, John Baldwin, Counselor Keller, Counselor McCaslin, K. Roberts, Thomas J. Part, Brian W. Carroll, Darrell F. Oman, Patty Sneed, C/O Koch, Terri Kennedy, Lacie Livingston, Michael P. Melvin, Sherer, Nurse Willinston, Nurse Rue, C/O Zaller, C/O Vison, Lieutenant Gooding, Officer Howell, Ashley Miller, Rice, K. Kaler, J.B. Pritzker, Chris Jose Delrosario, Marcos Reyes, David Rolecki, Amy Campanelli, Major Westfall, Nurse Nano, Fisher, Officer Hughes, Randy P. Fister, Rob Jefferys, Bruce Rauner, C. Smith, Maranda Tate, Hicks, Oaks, C/O Dralle, Dr. Pitman, Dr. Caldwell, Counselor Wykes and IDOC |
| 3:2019cv01123 |
| October 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Nancy J Rosenstengel |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER: Pursuant to Administrative Order 257, this case has been selected for reassignment to a Magistrate Judge. Within 21 days of this Order, any party not previously having filed a Notice and Consent to Proceed before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form in this case must file the attached form indicating that party's consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. The 21-day deadline set forth in this Order does not apply to unserved parties. Deadlines for newly served parties to consent or decline to consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge will be set by the Court at a later date. Consent due by 12/23/2019. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 12/2/2019. (Attachments: #1 Administrative Order)(dkd)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Filing Fee due by 12/5/2019. (jaj) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER: Taplin has not paid the full filing fee of $400.00, which was due by November 1, 2019. Prior to filing this action, Taplin filed more than three lawsuits as a prisoner that were dismissed as being frivolous, malicious, or meritless. See Taplin v. Cook County, et al., Case No. 16 C 8988, Doc. 7 (N.D. Ill.)(Tharp. J.). As a result, Taplin cannot proceed in forma pauperis unless he faces imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The Court previously found that the allegations in his Complaint do not establish that Taplin is under imminent danger of serious physical injury and denied his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 8). Taplin filed an Amended Complaint making the same allegations. (Doc. 9). Again, Taplin's allegations do not suggest that he is in imminent danger of serious physical harm. Accordingly, Taplin must pay the full filing fee of $400.00 to proceed in this action. The Court will grant Taplin an extension to December 5, 2019 to prepay his full $400.00 filing fee for this action. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of the case under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) without further notice from the Court. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 11/21/2019. (ksp)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Memorandum of Law against Dee Dee Brookhart, J.B. Pritzker, IDOC filed by Enos F. Taplin, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint)(jaj) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Amended Complaint due by 11/22/2019. (jaj) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: This matter does not survive 28 U.S.C. 1915A review, and the Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for violation of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8, 18, and 20 and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is DENIED. Plaintiff shall pay the full filing fee of $400.00 for this action within fourteen (14) days of the date of entry of this Order. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this Order in the time allotted by the Court, this case will be dismissed. Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order (Doc. 3) and his request for preliminary injunctive relief in his Complaint are DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion for Recruitment of Counsel (Doc. 4) is DENIED. Defendants Brian W. Carroll, Marcos Reyes, David Rolecki, Amy Campanelli, and Darrell F. Oman are DISMISSED with prejudice and the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to TERMINATE them as parties in the Court's Case Management/Electronic Case Filing system. Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to file a First Amended Complaint on or before November 22, 2019. Should Plaintiff fail to file his First Amended Complaint within the allotted time or consistent with the instructions set forth in the Order, the entire case shall be dismissed with prejudice for failure to comply with a court order and/or for failure to prosecute his claims. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 10/18/2019. (ksp)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE AND ORDER: The Court has received your complaint and your motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. Your case number is 19-cv-1123-NJR. The following is some information you should know regarding the initial stages of your lawsuit. After your filing fee status is determined, the Court will review your complaint to identify legally sufficient claims and defendants and dismiss any legally insufficient claims. See: 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915A. The Court will conduct this review within the next 60 days and inform you of the findings in a Merit Review Order. No other action will be taken in your case during this time, absent extraordinary circumstances. Therefore, you do not need to submit any evidence, argument, motions, or other documents. If you filed a motion for recruitment of counsel along with your complaint, it will not be considered until the merit review is complete. Please note that any motion for recruitment of counsel must include evidence of your own efforts to find counsel, such as a list of the attorneys you contacted and copies of letters you sent or received. See Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). If you do not receive a Merit Review Order within the next 60 days, you may file a motion requesting the status of your case. In the event your claim(s) survive the merit review, further information and instruction will be provided to you at that time. In addition, several administrative matters warrant mention. Any communication directed to the Court should be in the form of a motion or other pleading and not a letter. All mail should be sent to: Clerk's Office, U.S. District Court, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, IL 62201. A copy of the Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge form is attached to this Order. Finally, you are advised that if your address changes, you must notify the Court within seven days of the change by filing a Notice of Change of Address. Failure to do so could result in the dismissal of your case. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 10/16/2019. (jsm2)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF MODIFICATION re #1 Complaint filed by Enos F. Taplin, Jr., #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Enos F. Taplin, Jr., and #3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Motion for TRO filed by Enos F. Taplin, Jr. Entries modified to show correct filing date of 10/15/2019. No further action is required by the filer in relation to this notification. (jsm2)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Service of Process at Government Expense by Enos F. Taplin, Jr. (jsm2) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel by Enos F. Taplin, Jr. (jsm2) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Enos F. Taplin, Jr. (jsm2) Modified on 10/16/2019 (jsm2). |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Enos F. Taplin, Jr. (jsm2) Modified on 10/16/2019 (jsm2). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Enos F. Taplin, Jr.(jsm2) Modified on 10/16/2019 (jsm2). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
