Moore v. IDOC et al
| Cortez Larnell Moore |
| Dr. Siddiqui, Lt. Koehn, Jacqueline Lashbrook, C/O Burshur, John Baldwin, John Doe, Sgt. Macuria, IDOC, Sgt. Rowes, Dave White, Wexford Health Sources Incorporated and Lt. Trokey |
| 3:2019cv01206 |
| November 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Nancy J Rosenstengel |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (jsm2)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #11 Motion to the extent that monthly payments shall be sent to the Court in accordance with the Court Order at Doc. 6. The Clerk's Office is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Order and the Court Order at Doc. 6 to the Trust Fund Officer at Lawrence Correctional Center. Disregarding a court order may result in sanctions. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 12/9/2019. (tjk)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #10 Motion to Copy. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a copy of his motion to appoint counsel (Doc. 4). Plaintiff is reminded to keep copies of his own filings as the Court will not provide Plaintiff with copies of his own filings in the future. If Plaintiff wants additional copies of his own filings he will have to pay for them at the standard copying rate. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 12/4/2019. (anp)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION for Confirmation and Verification by Cortez Larnell Moore. (jsm2)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION for Copy by Cortez Larnell Moore. (jsm2)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER: Pursuant to Administrative Order 257, this case has been selected for reassignment to a Magistrate Judge. Within 21 days of this Order, any party not previously having filed a Notice and Consent to Proceed before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form in this case must file the attached form indicating that party's consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. The 21-day deadline set forth in this Order does not apply to unserved parties. Deadlines for newly served parties to consent or decline to consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge will be set by the Court at a later date. Consent due by 12/23/2019. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 12/2/2019. (Attachments: #1 Administrative Order)(dkd)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER GRANTING #7 Motion for Copies. Plaintiff requests a copy of the #1 Complaint and exhibits filed on November 4, 2019. As a one-time courtesy, the Clerk is DIRECTED to provide Plaintiff with a complete copy of Document 1. All further requests for copies should be made in writing to the Clerk of Court by referring to the case number and the document number and submitting the required prepayment of $0.50 per page. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 11/20/2019. (jsy) THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for Copy by Cortez Larnell Moore. (jsm2)
|
|
Initial Prisoner Filing Fee: $ 59.93 received, receipt number 34625097419 (amv)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") (Doc. #2 ). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b)(1), Plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $59.93. The agency having custody of Plaintiff is directed to forward the initial partial filing fee from Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of Court upon receipt of this Order. Plaintiff shall make monthly payments of 20% of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's prison trust fund account (including all deposits to the inmate account from any source) until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The agency having custody of Plaintiff shall forward payments from Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of this Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 until the $350.00 filing fee is paid.In addition, Plaintiff shall note that the filing fees for multiple cases cumulate. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 436 (7th Cir. 1997), overruled in part on other grounds by Lee v. Clinton, 209 F.3d 1025 (7th Cir. 2000); Walker v. O'Brien, 216 F.3d 626 (7th Cir. 2000). A prisoner who files one suit must remit 20% of his monthly income to the Clerk of the Court until his fees have been paid; a prisoner who files a second suit or an appeal must remit 40%; and so on. Newlin, 123 F.3d at 436. "Five suits or appeals mean that the prisoner's entire monthly income must be turned over to the court until the fees have been paid." Id. Payments shall be mailed to: Clerk of the Court, United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, Illinois 62201. The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this Order to the Trust Fund Officer at the Lawrence Correctional Center upon entry of this Order. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 11/12/2019. (tjk)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE AND ORDER: The Court has received your complaint and your motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. Your case number is 19-1206-NJR. The following is some information you should know regarding the initial stages of your lawsuit. After your filing fee status is determined, the Court will review your complaint to identify legally sufficient claims and defendants and dismiss any legally insufficient claims. See: 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915A. The Court will conduct this review within the next 60 days and inform you of the findings in a Merit Review Order. No other action will be taken in your case during this time, absent extraordinary circumstances. Therefore, you do not need to submit any evidence, argument, motions, or other documents. If you filed a motion for recruitment of counsel along with your complaint, it will not be considered until the merit review is complete. Please note that any motion for recruitment of counsel must include evidence of your own efforts to find counsel, such as a list of the attorneys you contacted and copies of letters you sent or received. See Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). If you do not receive a Merit Review Order within the next 60 days, you may file a motion requesting the status of your case. In the event your claim(s) survive the merit review, further information and instruction will be provided to you at that time. In addition, several administrative matters warrant mention. Any communication directed to the Court should be in the form of a motion or other pleading and not a letter. All mail should be sent to: Clerk's Office, U.S. District Court, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, IL 62201. A copy of the Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge form is attached to this Order. Finally, you are advised that if your address changes, you must notify the Court within seven days of the change by filing a Notice of Change of Address. Failure to do so could result in the dismissal of your case. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 11/4/2019. (jaj)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Cortez Larnell Moore. (jaj)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Service of Process at Government Expense by Cortez Larnell Moore. (jaj)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Cortez Larnell Moore. (jaj)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Cortez Larnell Moore. (Attachments: #1 Letter ot Explanation to this Honorable Court) #2 exhibits part 1) #3 Exhibits part 2) (jaj).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
