Drake v. Procter & Gamble Company
| Michael Drake |
| The Proctor & Gamble Company and Procter & Gamble Company |
| 3:2021cv00279 |
| March 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| David W Dugan |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 23
ORDER granting #22 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. On February 1, 2021, Plaintiff Michael Drake filed this putative class action in the Circuit Court of the Third Judicial Circuit, Madison County, Illinois. Defendant was served on February 12, 2021, and timely removed the action to this Court on March 12, 2021. Now before the Court is Defendant's third motion for extension of time to file an answer to Plaintiff's complaint to which Plaintiff does not object. For good cause shown, the deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint is extended through May 24, 2021. Absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extensions of this deadline shall be granted. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 5/10/2021. (kll)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 22 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, to Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint (Doc. 1-1) by Procter & Gamble Company. (Schott, David) |
|
Filing 21
ORDER granting #20 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant's motion for extension of time to file answer is GRANTED. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint by May 10, 2021. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 4/8/21. (kll)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 20 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, to Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint (Doc. 1-1) by Procter & Gamble Company. (Schott, David) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE TERMINATING JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, and a request for reassignment having been received, this case, in its entirety, is hereby reassigned to Judge David W. Dugan for further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly no longer assigned to the case. All future documents must bear case number 21-cv-279-DWD. (tba)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 18 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Green, Kevin) |
| Filing 17 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Schott, David) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas P. Rosenfeld on behalf of Michael Drake (Rosenfeld, Thomas) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark C. Goldenberg on behalf of Michael Drake (Goldenberg, Mark) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin P. Green on behalf of Michael Drake (Green, Kevin) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel Scott Levy on behalf of Michael Drake (Levy, Daniel) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard S. Cornfeld on behalf of Michael Drake (Cornfeld, Richard) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER: Defendant's #10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer is GRANTED. Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before 4/19/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 3/17/2021. (lmo)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint (Doc. 1-1) by Proctor & Gamble Company. (Schott, David) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE STRIKING ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS striking #5 Notice of Appearance filed by Proctor & Gamble Company. The incorrect document was attached. The filer has already re-filed the document at Doc #7 . No further action required by the filer. (tba)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Scott D. Bjorseth on behalf of The Proctor & Gamble Company (Bjorseth, Scott) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by David A. Schott on behalf of The Proctor & Gamble Company (Schott, David) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by The Proctor & Gamble Company. (Schott, David) |
| Filing 5 STRICKEN NOTICE of Appearance by David A. Schott on behalf of The Proctor & Gamble Company (Schott, David) Modified on 3/16/2021 (tba). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ACTION re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by The Proctor & Gamble Company. See Local Rule 83.1(f). In all cases filed in, removed to, or transferred to this court, all attorneys, including government attorneys, shall file a written entry of appearance before addressing the court. Attorney David Schott does not have a Notice of Appearance on file in this case. (tba)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in the case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order No. 257, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or nonconsent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: All Parties. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 21-cv-279-RJD. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. Consent due by 4/5/2021 (tba) |
| Filing 2 EXHIBIT by The Proctor & Gamble Company. Exhibit to #1 Notice of Removal, CIVIL COVER SHEET. (Schott, David) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Madison County Circuit Court, case number 2021L 000149 ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0754-4427039), filed by The Proctor & Gamble Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court File, #2 Exhibit Declaration of Carlos Quintero, #3 Exhibit Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #4 Exhibit State Court Docket)(Schott, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
