Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Drake v. Transworld Systems Inc.
as 3:2024cv00422
Plaintiff:
Michael Drake
Defendant:
Transworld Systems Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Drake v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Drake
Defendant:
R.C. Johnson and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Erick Michael Drake v. Warden Phillup
as 2:2023cv10251
Petitioner:
Eric Michael Drake
Respondent:
Warden Phillup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DRAKE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv23319
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DRAKE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martin v. Bradway et al
as 1:2023cv06754
Plaintiff:
Leon Martin
Defendant:
Robert A. Bradway, Wanda Austin, Michael Drake and others
Nominal Defendant:
Amgen, Inc.
Drake v. USA
as 1:2023cv00340
Petitioner:
Jordan Michael Drake
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. Erickson et al
as 4:2022cv04117
Plaintiff:
Charles Ray Johnson
Defendant:
Dave Erickson, Michael Drake, Joe Fishbaugher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
USA v. Jordan Drake
as 21-30167
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JORDAN MICHAEL DRAKE
DRAKE et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv06048
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.
Plaintiff:
FRONA BRIDGET DRAKE and MICHAEL DRAKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Drake v. Procter & Gamble Company
as 3:2021cv00279
Defendant:
The Proctor & Gamble Company and Procter & Gamble Company
Plaintiff:
Michael Drake
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
