Norfleet v. IDOC et al
| Marc Norfleet |
| Ron Skidmore, Patrick Keane, Angela Crain, IDOC, Frank Lawrence, Anthony Wills, Rob Jeffreys, Amy Burle and Gladyse C Taylor |
| 3:2021cv00515 |
| May 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Stephen P McGlynn |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 32 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Stephen P. McGlynn: Evidentiary Hearing held by Zoom video conferencing on 7/23/2021 re Plaintiffs claim of imminent danger. Pro Se Plaintiff Marc Norfleet and Attorney Rachel Schwarzlose participated. Evidence heard and taken under advisement. Orders to issue. Defendant is given seven (7) days to Supplement the record with an Affidavit of Christine Brown. Plaintiff given seven (7) days after the filing of the supplement to file a response. (Court Reporter Hannah Jagler.) (jsm2)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 31 EXHIBIT by Anthony Wills. Exhibit to #20 Response . (Schwarzlose, Rachel) |
Filing 30
ORDER granting #29 Motion to Supplement. Defendant shall file the supplemental exhibit instanter. Signed by Judge Stephen P. McGlynn on 7/23/2021. (jrj)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 29 MOTION to Supplement Defendant's Response (Court Doc. 20) by Anthony Wills. (Schwarzlose, Rachel) |
|
Filing 28
ORDER denying #26 Motion to Supplement. Plaintiff seeks to amend his claim of imminent danger by supplementing the Complaint. Plaintiff alleges that even though he has been transferred to Pinckneyville Correctional Center, he is still in imminent danger due to various conditions at the facility. In the supplement, he asserts new claims against IDOC and other individuals who are not defendants in this case. The motion is denied. The Court will not consider new claims against new individuals filed only three days before the evidentiary hearing. The purpose of the hearing is to determine if Plaintiff was in imminent danger at the time of filing. See Norfleet v. Baldwin, No. 19-1337, Doc. 9 (7th Cir. April 9, 2019). See also Ciarpaglini v. Saini, 351 F. 3d 328 (7th Cir. 2003). Additionally, the Court does not accept piecemeal amendments to a complaint. An amended complaint must include all claims against all defendants. In light of Plaintiff's transfer, however, the Court will allow the parties to provide arguments at the hearing regarding the effect of the transfer on Plaintiff's claim of imminent danger, as well as his request for preliminary injunctive relief. Signed by Judge Stephen P. McGlynn on 7/22/2021. (jrj)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 27 Docket Annotation - Plaintiff's address updated from Menard CC to Pinckneyville CC per information located in document #26 . (jaj) |
| Filing 26 MOTION to Supplement Imminent Danger Complaint and Provide Notice of IDOC Address Change by Marc Norfleet. (jaj) |
| Docket Annotation - Scanning Pinckneyville added and Scanning Menard terminated as to electronic transmissions. (jaj) |
| Filing 25 RESPONSE to Motion re #21 MOTION for Defendant Anthony Wills to Provide Running Hot Water in Cell and Supplemental Response to Claim of Imminent Danger filed by Anthony Wills. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Barnett, Tara) |
| Filing 24 NOTICE OF MODIFICATION re 22 Notice of Hearing. Text entry contains incorrect date for hearing. Entry has been modified. (jsm2)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 23 VIDEO WRIT ISSUED as to Marc Norfleet, R57214 to be held on 7/23/2021 at 11:00 AM by Judge Stephen P. McGlynn. (jsm2) |
| Filing 22 NOTICE of hearing on the claim of imminent danger, as alleged by Plaintiff in the #1 Complaint and subsequent filings (see Norfleet v. Baldwin, No. 19-1337, Doc. 9 (7th Cir. May 24, 2021)): Evidentiary Hearing via Zoom video conferencing set for 7/23/2021 at 11:00 a.m. before Judge Stephen P. McGlynn. Zoom invitation will be sent to parties. (jsm2)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. Modified on 7/2/2021 (jsm2). |
| Filing 21 MOTION for Defendant Anthony Wills to Provide Running Hot Water in Cell by Marc Norfleet. (jaj) |
| Filing 20 RESPONSE to #7 Notice (Other), #8 Notice (Other) filed by Anthony Wills. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G)(Schwarzlose, Rachel) |
|
Filing 19
HIPAA Qualified Protective Order. Signed by Judge Stephen P. McGlynn on 6/28/2021. (kare)
|
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by Rachel D. Schwarzlose on behalf of Anthony Wills (Schwarzlose, Rachel) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER granting #16 Motion for Protective Order. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter the standard qualified protective order pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. Signed by Judge Stephen P. McGlynn on 6/25/2021. (jrj)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 16 MOTION for Protective Order by Anthony Wills. (Barnett, Tara) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Tara Marie Barnett on behalf of Anthony Wills (Barnett, Tara) |
| Wills response to imminent danger due by 6/30/2021. (jaj) |
| Filing 14 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed Anthony Wills waiver sent on 6/16/2021. Response to Imminent Danger due 6/30/2021. |
| Filing 13 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Anthony Wills on 6/16/2021. Waiver of Service due by 7/16/2021. (jaj) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER: The Warden of Menard, Anthony Wills, is DIRECTED to respond to the allegations in the Complaint regarding Norfleet's claims of imminent danger within 14 days of service of the pleadings. Wills shall not answer or otherwise file a responsive pleading to the Complaint until the issue of imminent danger has been resolved. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to serve process on Anthony Wills in accordance with this Order. The motions seeking court action filed by Norfleet are DENIED as moot. (Docs. #9 , #10 , #11 ). Signed by Judge Stephen P. McGlynn on 6/16/2021. (jrj)
|
| Filing 11 THIRD MOTION Since June Third Requesting this Court Screen Plaintiff's Imminent Danger Complaint by Marc Norfleet. (jaj) |
| Filing 10 MOTION Seeking Action from the Court by Marc Norfleet. (jaj) |
| Filing 9 MOTION Seeking Action from the Court by Marc Norfleet. (jaj) |
| Filing 8 SECOND NOTICE of Extraordinary Circumstances by Marc Norfleet. (jaj) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Extraordinary Circumstances by Marc Norfleet. (jaj) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT/REASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, this case will remain with the assigned District Judge Stephen M. McGlynn. This Notice does not alter any prior referrals of motions or matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(b)(1-3). (jaj)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 5 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (jaj) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Marc Norfleet to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Marc Norfleet on 05/27/2021. Consent due by 6/17/2021 (kare) |
|
Filing 3
NOTICE AND ORDER: The Court has received your complaint and your motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. Your case number is 21-515-SPM. The following is some information you should know regarding the initial stages of your lawsuit. After your filing fee status is determined, the Court will review your complaint to identify legally sufficient claims and defendants and dismiss any legally insufficient claims. See: 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915A. The Court will conduct this review within the next 60 days and inform you of the findings in a Merit Review Order. No other action will be taken in your case during this time, absent extraordinary circumstances. Therefore, you do not need to submit any evidence, argument, motions, or other documents. If you filed a motion for recruitment of counsel along with your complaint, it will not be considered until the merit review is complete. Please note that any motion for recruitment of counsel must include evidence of your own efforts to find counsel, such as a list of the attorneys you contacted and copies of letters you sent or received. See Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). If you do not receive a Merit Review Order within the next 60 days, you may file a motion requesting the status of your case. In the event your claim(s) survive the merit review, further information and instruction will be provided to you at that time. In addition, several administrative matters warrant mention. Any communication directed to the Court should be in the form of a motion or other pleading and not a letter. All mail should be sent to: Clerk's Office, U.S. District Court, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, IL 62201. Finally, you are advised that if your address changes, you must notify the Court within seven days of the change by filing a Notice of Change of Address. Failure to do so could result in the dismissal of your case.. Signed by Judge Stephen P. McGlynn on 5/27/2021. (kare)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Marc Norfleet. (kare) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Marc Norfleet.(kare) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
