Baker v. Cypress Illinois School District # 64
James Baker |
Cypress Illinois School District # 64 |
3:2021cv00821 |
July 16, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
David W Dugan |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint and Alternative Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Prayer for Punitive Damages and Brief in Support filed by James Baker. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proposed First Amended Complaint)(Sullenger, D.) |
Filing 10 ORDER. Scheduling Conference set for 9/21/2021 at 10:30 AM via Zoom video conference before Judge David W. Dugan. The Parties will receive the appropriate Zoom invitation via email from the Court. The Joint Report of the Parties is due on or before 9/14/2021 and shall be submitted via email to DWDpd@ilsd.uscourts.gov. The Parties are instructed to use the correct form for the Joint Report of the Parties which can be found within the attached Order. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 8/17/2021. (dmw2) |
Filing 9 CJRA TRACK B assigned: Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/6/2022 at 10:00 AM and Jury Trial set for 10/17/2022 at 9:00 AM both in the East St. Louis Courthouse before Judge David W. Dugan. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 8/17/2021. (dmw2) |
Filing 8 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Cypress Illinois School District # 64. (Igoe, Heather) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint and Alternative Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Prayer for Punitive Damages and Brief in Support by Cypress Illinois School District # 64. Responses due by 9/20/2021 (Igoe, Heather) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Heather R. Igoe on behalf of Cypress Illinois School District # 64 (Igoe, Heather) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by James Baker. Cypress Illinois School District # 64 served on 7/26/2021, answer due 8/16/2021. (Sullenger, D.) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Cypress Illinois School District # 64 and returned to Attorney D. Wes Sullenger. (trb) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by D. Wes Sullenger on behalf of James Baker (Sullenger, D.) |
Filing 2 Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge David W. Dugan assigned. All future documents must bear case number 21-821-DWD. (trb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cypress Illinois School District # 64 ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0754-4528662.), filed by James Baker. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Sullenger, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Baker v. Cypress Illinois School District # 64 | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: James Baker | |
Represented By: | D. Wes Sullenger |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Cypress Illinois School District # 64 | |
Represented By: | Heather R. Igoe |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.