Cases 1 - 10 of 243
Baker v. Otto Bock Patient Care LLC
as 2:2024cv04783
Plaintiff:
James Wesley Haygood and James Baker
Defendant:
Otto Bock Patient Care LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Declaratory Judgment
BAKER et al v. RASTELLI FOODS LLC et al
as 1:2024cv08882
Plaintiff:
BRITTANI BO BAKER, AL, JAMES BAKER and others
Defendant:
RAYMOND RASTELLI, JR., DAYMOND JOHN, RASTELLI FOODS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00359
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bridgett Watson Adams et al v. 3M Company
as 4:2024cv00832
Plaintiff:
Luecinda Baker, Mildred Adams, Marquia Adley and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Malon v. Koskinas et al
as 3:2024cv01052
Defendant:
Ryan Paulsson, Town of Westport, Sullivan and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Malon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Booth v. A&E Television Networks et al
as 1:2024cv04496
Defendant:
Court TV, A&E Television Networks, Chastity Josephina Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Joseph Booth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00371
Defendant:
American Fire and Casualty Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
James Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Baker et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 1:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
James Baker and Sheryl Baker
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Barack v. MTX Realty, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Michael Barack
Defendant:
MTX Realty LLC and Mr. James Baker
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
