Cases 1 - 10 of 221
Baker v. Streeval
as 7:2023cv00234
Petitioner:
Gregory James Baker
Respondent:
J. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Baker v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv13910
Plaintiff:
James Baker
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Alterik Baker v. Megan Clark
as 23-6020
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALTERIK JAMES BAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
MEGAN L. CLARK, Commonwealth Attorney, MICHAEL J. HALLAHAN, II, Attorney and PRESTON G. WILLIAMS, Attorney
Azhar Lal v. USA, et al
as 22-16907
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AZHAR LAL
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, HENRY CATTO, JAMES BAKER and others
Baker v. Iowa Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2022cv00384
Plaintiff:
Jessie James Baker
Defendant:
Iowa Department of Corrections, Tabitha DeZee, Christopher Coughlin and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAKER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17160
Plaintiff:
JAMES BAKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gregory Baker v. USA
as 22-12823
Petitioner / Appellant:
GREGORY JAMES BAKER
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BAKER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14994
Plaintiff:
JAMES BAKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Baker v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2022cv02463
Defendant:
3M Company, The, DuPont de Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
James Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
