Cases 1 - 10 of 13
BAKER v. PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
JAMES BAKER
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
BAKER v. PA DOC et al
as 1:2021cv02146
Plaintiff:
James Baker
Defendant:
PA DOC, Sci Fayette, Sci Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. PA DOC et al
as 2:2021cv05352
Plaintiff:
JAMES BAKER
Defendant:
PA DOC, SCI FAYETTE, SCI GREEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. REZNYK
as 2:2021cv04296
Plaintiff:
JAMES BAKER
Defendant:
AMANDA L REZNYK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAKER v. WARDEN-SCI MAHANOY et al
as 2:2020cv00927
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, WARDEN-SCI MAHANOY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
JAMES BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv01890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
MacDonald v. Grady Rentals, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv03023
Plaintiff:
James MacDonald
Defendant:
Grady Rentals, LLC , Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C. and James Baker
Cross_claimant:
Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C. , James Baker and Grady Rentals, LLC
Cross_defendant:
Grady Rentals, LLC , James Baker and Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv02893
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Baker v. Walsh et al
as 3:2013cv00652
Petitioner:
Ronald James Baker
Respondent:
Jerome Walsh and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv06444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
