King v. Hill et al
| Matthew Alexander King |
| Kathy Hill, S. Wallace, Tammy Hottes, Dan Sproul, J. Leclair, Barbara Von Blanckensee, Amber Nelson, Mary Noland, Katherine Siereveld and Tracy Knutson |
| 3:2021cv01714 |
| December 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| J Phil Gilbert |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT/REASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, this case will remain with the assigned District Judge J. Phil Gilbert. This Notice does not alter any prior referrals of motions or matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(b)(1-3). (kare)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 5 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Jones, Laura) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Plaintiff and Defendants to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Plaintiff and Defendants on 12/21/2021. Consent due by 1/11/2022 (kare) |
Filing 3
NOTICE AND ORDER: Defendants removed this action from state court on 12/20/2021. The case has been assigned to Judge J. Phil Gilbert and all pleadings shall bear the case number 21-1714-JPG.The Complaint appears to be a civil action, filed by a prisoner (as defined by the Prison Litigation Reform Act), seeking redress from a governmental entity and/or officer or employee of a governmental entity. Such actions are subject to a preliminary merits review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915A. Martin v. United States, 96 F.3d 853, 854 (7th Cir. 1996). Accordingly, if the Court finds that removal is proper, the Court will proceed with reviewing the Complaint pursuant to Section 1915A. The Court will conduct this review within the next 60 days and inform the parties of the findings in a Merit Review Order. If the parties do not receive a Merit Review Order within the next 60 days, a motion for status may be filed. If the Complaint survives the merit review, further information and instruction will be provided at that time. Any communication directed to the Court should be in the form of a motion or other pleading and not a letter. All mail should be sent to: Clerk's Office, U.S. District Court, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, IL 62201. Finally, Petitioner is advised that if his address changes, he must notify the Court within seven days of the change by filing a Notice of Change of Address. Failure to do so could result in the dismissal of this case.. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 12/21/2021. (kare)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Case Assigned to Judge J. Phil Gilbert. (kare) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Laura J. Jones on behalf of All Defendants (Jones, Laura) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Williamson County Circuit Court, case number 2021-L-142, filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, Application for Waiver of Fees, Order Granting Waiver of Fees, Docket, #2 Exhibit Certification, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Jones, Laura) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
