Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Andre' Drew v. Unit Case Manager Murphy, et al
as 24-1116
Plaintiff:
ANDRE' DREW
Defendant:
UNIT CASE MANAGER MURPHY, INSTRUCTOR SHAW, Drug Education Coordinator, COORDINATOR GAUTHIER, Drug Treatment Program and others
Robert Decker v. Dan Sproul
as 23-1585
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT K. DECKER
Respondent / Appellee:
DAN SPROUL
Christy v. Sproul et al
as 3:2023cv00888
Petitioner:
Shawn R. Christy
Respondent:
Dan Sproul, Mrs. C. Sozal and Kirsten Nielson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gary v. USA et al
as 3:2023cv00768
Plaintiff:
James L. Gary
Defendant:
USA, Kathy Hill, Dan Sproul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Doe 600 et al v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 0:2023cv00445
Petitioner:
Doe 600 and Circle R Ranch
Respondent:
U.S. Bureau of Prisons, Pekin, Illinois Federal Corrections Institute, Warden Dan Sproul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Talib v. Graland et al
as 3:2023cv00458
Petitioner:
Yayah Talib
Respondent:
Merrick Graland and Dan Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pernell v. Does #1-7 et al
as 3:2023cv00374
Plaintiff:
Arya Milan Pernell and Aaron Pernell
Defendant:
John Does #1-7, Dan Sproul, Colette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Decker v. Sproul
as 3:2023cv00045
Petitioner:
Robert K. Decker
Respondent:
Dan Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Waugh v. Weinhoeft et al
as 3:2022cv03016
Plaintiff:
Tommy L. Waugh
Defendant:
Steven D Weinhoeft, Laura J Jones, Nathan Wyatt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Akers v. Sproul et al
as 3:2022cv02469
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
Dan Sproul, A. McCaffery, G. Soza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
