Haywood v. Jones et al
Donald Haywood |
Anthony B. Jones, Joshuaa Schoenbeck and Walker |
3:2022cv01219 |
June 9, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Stephen P McGlynn |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Initial Prisoner Filing Fee: $ 12.67 received, receipt number 44625014774 (kdw) |
|
|
Filing 10 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (kare) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Clarify by Donald Haywood. (kare) |
Filing 8 RESPONSE to 5 Order,,,,,,, filed by Donald Haywood. (kare) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Proceed with Case by Donald Haywood. (amv) |
Filing 6 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Haywood to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Haywood on 6/9/2022. Consent due by 6/30/2022 (tjk) |
|
Filing 4 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel by Donald Haywood. (tjk) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Donald Haywood. (tjk) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Donald Haywood.(tjk) |
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.