Curtis v. Jarrett, et al.
| Courtney Curtis |
| Counselor Jarrett, Lt. Brooks, Shaw, John Doe, Lt. Hendrickson, Ms. Houser and Daniel Sproul |
| 3:2022cv02082 |
| September 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| J Phil Gilbert |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's second motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #16 ) based on the financial information provided with the motion. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 11/2/2022. (tjk)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER DISCHARGING #12 Order to Show Cause, based on Plaintiff's #14 Response filed October 26, 2022. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 10/31/2022. (jsy)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT/REASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, this case will remain with the assigned District Judge J. Phil Gilbert. This Notice does not alter any prior referrals of motions or matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(b)(1-3). (kare) |
| Filing 17 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (csb) |
| Filing 16 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Courtney Curtis. (csb) |
| Filing 15 RESPONSE to #13 Order. filed by Courtney Curtis. (csb) |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE filed by Courtney Curtis. (csb) |
| Filing fee: $ 30.00, receipt number 848 (clw) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER: Plaintiff's motion for IFP (Doc. 2) is GRANTED. Based upon the information contained in her prison trust fund account statement (Doc. 2), Plaintiff is ORDERED to pay an initial partial filing fee of $25.29 within FOURTEEN DAYS of the entry of this Order (on or before November 3, 2022). Additionally, because Plaintiff is no longer detained or incarcerated, she must pay the remaining balance of the $350.00 filing fee ($324.71) or file an updated motion to proceed IFP with regard to the balance within FOURTEEN DAYS of the entry of this Order (also on or before November 3, 2022). The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a blank Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP form along with a copy of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff does not comply with this Order in the time allotted, this case will be dismissed for failure to comply with an Order of this Court. (Action due by 11/3/2022). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 10/20/2022. (tjk)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Consistent with Administrative Order No. 257, Curtis was previously directed to file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. The time for doing so has long passed, and in spite of a warning and additional time to do so, said party continues to ignore the Court's directive by not returning the form. Thus, Curtis is ordered to SHOW CAUSE why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to file the attached form as is required under Administrative Order No. 257. Show Cause Response re Consent due by 10/26/2022. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 10/12/2022. (tjk)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER: Plaintiff's motion for IFP (Doc. 2) is GRANTED. Based upon the information contained in her prison trust fund account statement (Doc. 2), Plaintiff is ORDERED to pay an initial partial filing fee of $25.29 within FOURTEEN DAYS of the entry of this Order (on or before October 12, 2022). The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a blank Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP form along with a copy of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff does not comply with this Order in the time allotted, this case will be dismissed for failure to comply with an Order of this Court. (Action due by 10/12/2022). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 9/28/2022. (tjk)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE: Courtney Curtis was directed to file the attached form regarding consenting or declining to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. The time for doing so has now passed, and the Court has not received the form. As required by Administrative Order No. 257, Courtney Curtis shall return the form within 7 days or face possible sanctions. Consent due by 10/5/2022 (kare) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Plaintiff to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Plaintiff on 9/6/2022. Consent due by 9/27/2022 (jaj) |
|
Filing 8
This Court has received your complaint and your motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee from the Northern District of Ohio, previously assigned case number: 22-295. Your new case number is 22-2082-JPG. The following is some information you should know regarding the initial stages of your lawsuit. After your filing fee status is determined, the Court will review your complaint to identify legally sufficient claims and defendants and dismiss any legally insufficient claims. See: 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915A. The Court will conduct this review within the next 60 days and inform you of the findings in a Merit Review Order. No other action will be taken in your case during this time, absent extraordinary circumstances. Therefore, you do not need to submit any evidence, argument, motions, or other documents. If you filed a motion for recruitment of counsel along with your complaint, it will not be considered until the merit review is complete. Please note that any motion for recruitment of counsel must include evidence of your own efforts to find counsel, such as a list of the attorneys you contacted and copies of letters you sent or received. See Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). If you do not receive a Merit Review Order within the next 60 days, you may file a motion requesting the status of your case. In the event your claim(s) survive the merit review, further information and instruction will be provided to you at that time. In addition, several administrative matters warrant mention. Any communication directed to the Court should be in the form of a motion or other pleading and not a letter. All mail should be sent to: Clerk's Office, U.S. District Court, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, IL 62201. Finally, you are advised that if your address changes, you must notify the Court within seven days of the change by filing a Notice of Change of Address. Failure to do so could result in the dismissal of your case. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 9/6/2022. (jaj)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 7 Case transferred in from District of Ohio Northern; Case Number 4:22-cv-00295. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
|
Filing 6
Order of Transfer The Northern District of Ohio is not the proper venue for this case. All of the defendants are officials at USP Marion, which is located in Marion, Illinois. All of the events giving rise to the Complaint occurred in the city of Marion, Illinois. Marion, Illinois is located within the Southern Judicial District of Illinois. Accordingly, this action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 9/2/2022. (JLG) [Transferred from Ohio Northern on 9/6/2022.]
|
| Copy of #6 Order of Transfer mailed to Plaintiff Courtney Curtis #16481-509, Dismas House, 6819 Georgeland Ave., Berkeley, MO 63134 on 9/2/2022. Related document(s) #6 . (JLG) [Transferred from Ohio Northern on 9/6/2022.] |
| Filing 5 Address Change Notice filed by Courtney Curtis. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(D,Ju) [Transferred from Ohio Northern on 9/6/2022.] |
| Filing 4 Motion to Combine Cases and Request for Status Update filed by Plaintiff Courtney Curtis. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(G,M) [Transferred from Ohio Northern on 9/6/2022.] |
| The filer is advised that the U.S. Marshal Service requires a USM Form 285 for each individual, company, or corporation to be served. The USM Form 285 can be found at www.uscourts.gov under# Forms. A blank copy of the USM Form 285 and a blank Summons has been mailed to Courtney Curtis #16481-509, FCI Elkton, P.O. Box 10, Lisbon, OH 44432. Related document(s) #1 . (G,M) [Transferred from Ohio Northern on 9/6/2022.] |
| Filing 3 FILING ERROR - Magistrate Consent Form issued. (G,M) Modified on 3/8/2022 (G,M). [Transferred from Ohio Northern on 9/6/2022.] |
| Filing 2 Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis filed by Plaintiff Courtney Curtis. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 envelope)(G,M) [Transferred from Ohio Northern on 9/6/2022.] |
| Filing 1 Complaint against Counselor Jarrett, John Doe, Ms. Houser, Lt. Brooks, Lt. Hendrickson, Ms. Shaw, Daniel Sproul. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Courtney Curtis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 transmittal letter, #3 envelope) (G,M) [Transferred from Ohio Northern on 9/6/2022.] |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp. (G,M) [Transferred from Ohio Northern on 9/6/2022.] |
| Judge Benita Y. Pearson assigned to case. (G,M) [Transferred from Ohio Northern on 9/6/2022.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
