Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Loops, L.L.C. v. Maxill, Inc., et al.
as 4:2026cv02966
Defendant:
John Dennie Shaw, Maxill Realty, Inc., an Ohio Corporation, Maxill, Inc., a Canadian corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Loops, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Hullum v. Mici, et al
as 26-2271
Defendant:
JOSEPH KILLEA, MICHAEL CHELLIS, GEARY R. WEAVER and others
Plaintiff:
LANCE X'NEEL HULLUM
United States of America v. Jackson (Fuller)
as 26-3225
Defendant:
KEVON HOLT, MAXINE DAVIS, STEPHEN MATTIS and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
McGregor v. Shaw et al
as 1:2026cv07139
Defendant:
Provideer- Bossey, Gerald Houribar, Mrs. Occonelle and others
Plaintiff:
Chad Michael McGregor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson #951188 v. Chandler et al
as 2:2026cv00275
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Unknown Party #1, Unknown Shaw and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Jackson #951188, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv14973
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv14973
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Shaw v. Harris County Jail et al
as 4:2026cv09750
Defendant:
Grievance Board, Shift Supervisor's 4th Floor, Kitchen Supervisor and others
Plaintiff:
Jessica Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03729
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Shaw et al v. Nationwide General Insurance Company
as 2:2026cv14188
Defendant:
Nationwide General Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Casey Shaw and Peter Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
