Cases 1 - 10 of 112
MURRAY v. SHAW et al
as 1:2024cv00640
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE M MURRAY and MICHELLE M. MURRAY
Defendant:
DEBBIE SHAW, JOSCELYN FUNNIE, LISA REIN and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Capital Power Corporation, et al v. FERC
as 23-1231
Petitioner:
Capital Power Corporation, D. E. Shaw Renewable Investments, L.L.C., EDP Renewables North America LLC and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Capital Power Corporation, et al v. FERC
as 23-1134
Petitioner:
Capital Power Corporation, D. E. Shaw Renewable Investments, L.L.C., EDP Renewables North America LLC and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
DIXON v. PETERS et al
as 1:2023cv00738
Not Classified By Court:
COLETTE S. PETERS
Plaintiff:
DIJON DIXON
Defendant:
EUGENE BAINE, J.C. PETRUCCI, MICHAEL FRAZIER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA TO NON-PARTY JOURNALIST CARL PRINE
as 1:2022mc00109
In Re:
MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA TO NON-PARTY JOURNALIST CARL PRINE
Petitioner:
CARL PRINE
Respondent:
STEVEN E. SHAW
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SHAW v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
as 1:2022cv01317
Plaintiff:
STEVEN E. SHAW
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Jonathan Burrs v. USA, et al
as 22-5128
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jonathan Burrs
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Carrier Global Corporation and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00917
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
