Lowman et al v. Watson et al
| Joseph D Lowman, Christopher T. Farr, Monte J Conrad, Jr., Devonte T Franklin, Sr., Maurice Fuller, Devin Harris, Jermel D Ware, Sr., Dax A Baldridge, Fred Duck, Demarkus Reid and Montel Harkins |
| Richard Watson, Tammy Grime, St. Clair County Jail, Collins, Brown, Moore, Messy and Wright |
| 3:2023cv00373 |
| February 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Nancy J Rosenstengel |
| Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Document 15 sent to Devon Harris (jaj) |
| Filing 19 JOINT DECLARATION by All Plaintiffs. (jaj) |
| Filing 18 RESPONSE to #5 Order filed by Maurice Fuller. (jaj) |
| Filing 17 EXHIBIT by Joseph D Lowman. Exhibit to #1 Complaint. (adh) |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE to #5 Order,, Set Deadlines, filed by Christopher T. Farr. (adh) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT/REASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Administrative Order Nos. 257 and 341, this case will remain with the assigned Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel. This Notice does not alter any prior referrals of motions or matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(b)(1-3). (jaj)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 8 STRICKEN - NOTICE: all Plaintiffs was directed to file the attached form regarding consenting or declining to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. The time for doing so has now passed, and the Court has not received the form. As required by Administrative Order Nos. 257 and 341, all Plaintiffs shall return the form within 7 days or face possible sanctions. Consent due by 3/7/2023 (jaj) Modified on 2/28/2023 (kare). |
| Filing 14 SUPPLEMENT by Joseph D Lowman.. (kare) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE to #5 Order,, Set Deadlines, filed by Devonte T Franklin, Sr. (kare) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE to #5 Order,, Set Deadlines, filed by Jermel D Ware, Sr. (kare) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE to #5 Order,, Set Deadlines, filed by Demarkus Reid. (kare) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to #5 Order,, Set Deadlines, filed by Monte J Conrad, Jr. (kare) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (kare) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE by Dax A Baldridge re #5 to remain a plaintiff in the case. (jlrr) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Montel Harkins to remain a plaintiff in case in re #5 Order. (jlrr) |
Filing 5
ORDER re #1 Complaint filed by Joseph D Lowman. All plaintiffs shall advise the Court in writing whether they wish to continue as a plaintiff in this group action. Failure to respond will result in their dismissal from the case. Response due by 3/7/2023. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 2/7/2023. (anp)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Joseph D. Lowman to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Joseph D. Lowman on 2/6/23. Consent due by 2/27/2023 (adh) |
|
Filing 3
NOTICE AND ORDER: The Court has received your complaint and your motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. Your case number is 3:23-cv-373-NJR. The following is some information you should know regarding the initial stages of your lawsuit. After your filing fee status is determined, the Court will review your complaint to identify legally sufficient claims and defendants and dismiss any legally insufficient claims. See: 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915A. The Court will conduct this review within the next 60 days and inform you of the findings in a Merit Review Order. No other action will be taken in your case during this time, absent extraordinary circumstances. Therefore, you do not need to submit any evidence, argument, motions, or other documents. If you filed a motion for recruitment of counsel along with your complaint, it will not be considered until the merit review is complete. Please note that any motion for recruitment of counsel must include evidence of your own efforts to find counsel, such as a list of the attorneys you contacted and copies of letters you sent or received. See Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). If you do not receive a Merit Review Order within the next 60 days, you may file a motion requesting the status of your case. In the event your claim(s) survive the merit review, further information and instruction will be provided to you at that time. In addition, several administrative matters warrant mention. Any communication directed to the Court should be in the form of a motion or other pleading and not a letter. All mail should be sent to: Clerk's Office, U.S. District Court, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, IL 62201. Finally, you are advised that if your address changes, you must notify the Court within seven days of the change by filing a Notice of Change of Address. Failure to do so could result in the dismissal of your case.. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 2/6/2023. (adh)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Joseph D Lowman. (adh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Joseph D Lowman.(adh) (Main Document 1 replaced on 2/7/2023) (mar). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
