Cases 1 - 10 of 29,043
Wright v. Smart ERP Solutions, Inc.
as 3:2025cv02588
Plaintiff:
Randall Wright
Defendant:
Smart ERP Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
WRIGHT v. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA et al
as 4:2025cv02603
Plaintiff:
TISHAY WRIGHT
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA and DOES 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Goins v. T.D.O.C. et al
as 1:2025cv00089
Plaintiff:
Daniel Goins
Defendant:
T.D.O.C., Air Mart, Sintinnial Med. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clanton v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
as 2:2025cv00501
Plaintiff:
Christopher Clanton
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
PAGE-JONES v. WRIGHT et al
as 2:2025cv00372
Plaintiff:
AKEEM PAGE-JONES
Defendant:
SARGENT WRIGHT, SARGENT MAHON and CAPTAIN MARTUCCI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cooke v. Wright et al
as 2:2025cv00154
Petitioner:
Donald Ray Cooke, Jr.
Respondent:
Sarah Elizabeth Wright, John Blake Drewery and Duncan Minton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Due Figlie LLC et al v. AFG Companies, Inc. et al
as 3:2025cv00629
Plaintiff:
Due Figlie LLC and Shawn Lucas
Defendant:
AFG Companies, Inc. and Ralph Wright Brewer, III
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Wright, Reginald v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2025cv21247
Plaintiff:
Reginald James Wright
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Donald (Wright)
as 25-608
Defendant:
TREVON WRIGHT, ERIC HAYES, TRAVON JONES and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Wright v. Select Bank et al

as 5:2025cv00021
Plaintiff:
Patricia Wright
Defendant:
Select Bank, Patrick E. Berrang, J. Michael Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1) Rent, Lease & Ejectment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.