Cases 1 - 10 of 429
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Davis v. Wright et al
as 1:2024cv00783
Plaintiff:
Tyreek Davis
Defendant:
A.J. Wright, E. Brandolino, Filoni and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Wright v. USA
as 2:2024cv00233
Petitioner:
Leander La'Curtis Wright
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Denis Alberto Rivera
Defendant:
David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke, Randall C. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benites Sosa v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Wilber Jose Benites Sosa
Defendant:
Glendell Hill, Prince William-Manassas Regional Adult Detention Center, Pete Meletis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stusalitus v. Wright et al
as 2:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
Leon Barcley Stusalitus
Defendant:
Kelvin L Wright and Angelique Herrera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question-Violation of Due Process
Rice v. Kilgore et al
as 7:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Keith Rice
Defendant:
Major Kilgore, Captain McCoy, Corp. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. Kilcore et al
as 2:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Keith Rice
Defendant:
Major Kilcore, Captain McCoy, Courple Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopkins et al v. Capital One , N.A. et al
as 1:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hopkins, Jerry Magaa, Seth Martindale and others
Defendant:
Capital One, N.A. and Capital One Financial Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Wright v. Geo Group INC
as 2:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Timothy E. Wright, Jr.
Defendant:
Geo Group INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
