Case Number: 1:2005cv00216
Filed: February 14, 2005
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: Tim A. Baker
Presiding Judge: David Frank Hamilton
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 146 ENTRY GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANTS. The plaintiffs having not responded to this court's order to show cause as discussed herein, the court grants summary judgment in favor of defendants. Final judgments in both cases shall now issue. Signed by Judge David Frank Hamilton on 7/16/2009.(LBK)
June 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 143 ENTRY ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO STAY OR CERTIFY. See Entry for particulars re: ruling on Plaintiffs' motion to stay or certify. At this point, plaintiffs have missed their deadline to come forward with evidence that the challenged settleme nt offers would actually deceive unsophisticated consumers. Without such evidence, it appears that plaintiffs cannot satisfy their burden of proof on an essential element of their claim. Plaintiffs shall show cause no later than 7/10/09 why the court should not enter summary judgment for defendants on that basis. Defendants may file a response no later than 14 days after plaintiffs respond. Signed by Judge David Frank Hamilton on 6/19/2009.(LBK)
February 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 137 ORDER denying Motions to Approve the Proposed Survey Methodology; (122) in case 1:05-cv-00216-DFH-TAB, and (122) in case 1:05-cv-00218-DFH-TAB. The court will extend for another 90 days (until May 24, 2009) the time for plaintiff to design, complete, and submit to defendants the results of truly probative surveys. Signed by Judge David Frank Hamilton on 2/23/2009. (WJC)
December 19, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 117 ENTRY on Plaintiff's 84 Motion to Certify Class. See Entry for particulars. The defendants' motion to strike portions of Hubbard's reply brief is denied. No later than January 9, 2009, plaintiff's counsel shall promptly prepa re and file an appropriate proposed notice to the class to comply with Rule 23(c)(2), after having given defendants a reasonable opportunity to consider proposed language. If the parties do not agree, defendants will have 14 days to comment on the proposed notice. Signed by Judge David Frank Hamilton on 12/19/2008. (LBK)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HUBBARD v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?