HUBBARD v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
| 1:2005cv00216 |
| February 14, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Tim A. Baker |
| David Frank Hamilton |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
146
ENTRY GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANTS. The plaintiffs having not responded to this court's order to show cause as discussed herein, the court grants summary judgment in favor of defendants. Final judgments in both cases shall now issue. Signed by Judge David Frank Hamilton on 7/16/2009.(LBK)
|
|
Filing
143
ENTRY ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO STAY OR CERTIFY. See Entry for particulars re: ruling on Plaintiffs' motion to stay or certify. At this point, plaintiffs have missed their deadline to come forward with evidence that the challenged settleme nt offers would actually deceive unsophisticated consumers. Without such evidence, it appears that plaintiffs cannot satisfy their burden of proof on an essential element of their claim. Plaintiffs shall show cause no later than 7/10/09 why the court should not enter summary judgment for defendants on that basis. Defendants may file a response no later than 14 days after plaintiffs respond. Signed by Judge David Frank Hamilton on 6/19/2009.(LBK)
|
|
Filing
137
ORDER denying Motions to Approve the Proposed Survey Methodology; (122) in case 1:05-cv-00216-DFH-TAB, and (122) in case 1:05-cv-00218-DFH-TAB. The court will extend for another 90 days (until May 24, 2009) the time for plaintiff to design, complete, and submit to defendants the results of truly probative surveys. Signed by Judge David Frank Hamilton on 2/23/2009. (WJC)
|
|
Filing
117
ENTRY on Plaintiff's 84 Motion to Certify Class. See Entry for particulars. The defendants' motion to strike portions of Hubbard's reply brief is denied. No later than January 9, 2009, plaintiff's counsel shall promptly prepa re and file an appropriate proposed notice to the class to comply with Rule 23(c)(2), after having given defendants a reasonable opportunity to consider proposed language. If the parties do not agree, defendants will have 14 days to comment on the proposed notice. Signed by Judge David Frank Hamilton on 12/19/2008. (LBK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: HUBBARD v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
