IN RE: READY-MIXED CONCRETE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Defendant: READY-MIXED CONCRETE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Case Number: 1:2005cv00979
Filed: June 30, 2005
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge:
Referring Judge:
Nature of Suit: Anti-Trust
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2010. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 874 ORDER granting plaintiffs' 867 Motion for Attorney Fees, Reimbursement of Expenses and award of Class Representatives' Incentive Fee from Builder's Settlement (S.O.). Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 8/17/2010. (MAC)
May 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 849 ORDER granting Plaintiffs' 840 Motion for award of Attorneys' Fees, Reimbursement of Expenses and award of Class Representatives' Incentive fee from Beaver and Hughey Settlements (S.O.). Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 5/17/2010. (MAC)
April 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 827 ORDER granting 825 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Settlement, Certifying Settlement Class, and Directing Notice. (Builder's Defendants). Fairness Hearing set for 8/17/2010 10:00 AM in room #216 before Judge Sarah Evans Barker. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 4/8/2010. (MAC)
March 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 824 JUDGMENT - Order and Final Judgment Approving Settlment with IMI Defendants 812 Joint MOTION for Final Approval of Settlement Agreement With Defendants Irving Materials, Inc., Fred R. (Pete) Irving, Daniel Butler, John Huggins and Price Irving filed by CHEROKEE DEVELOPMENT, INC., IRVING MATERIALS, INC., JOHN HUGGINS, MARMAX CONSTRUCTION, LLC, KORT BUILDERS, INC., DANIEL C. BUTLER, PRICE IRVING, FRED R (PETE) IRVING, DAN GROTE, T&R CONTRACTOR, INC., BOYLE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 3/30/2010.(MAC)
December 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 781 ORDER granting 776 Motion for Order Preliminiarily Approving Settlement, Certifying Settlement Class, and Directing Notice. Fairness Hearing set for 3/29/2010 10:00 AM in room #216 before Judge Sarah Evans Barker. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 12/18/2009. (PGS)
October 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 754 ORDER denying as moot 733 Motion for Reconsideration; APPROVES re 752 Stipulation of Settlement Class Counsel and Duke Construction filed by DUKE CONSTRUCTION (S.O.). Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 10/19/2009. (MAC)
September 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 738 ORDER Addressing Pending Motions: granting 397 Motion to Certify Class; denying 550 Motion; denying 558 Motion; denying 672 Motion to Strike ; Granting 682 Motion to Strike (S.O.). Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 9/9/2009. (MAC) Modified on 9/10/2009 (MAC).
November 21, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 696 ORDER granting plaintiffs' 694 Motion for Approval of Settlement Agreement with Lex Group, LLC. (S.O.). Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 11/21/08. (MAC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: IN RE: READY-MIXED CONCRETE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: READY-MIXED CONCRETE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?