COOK v. FARMERS' INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
| 1:2006cv01536 |
| October 19, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Tim A. Baker |
| Richard L. Young |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
108
ENTRY ON PLAINTIFFS OBJECTION TO RECOMMENDATION OFMAGISTRATE JUDGE. Plaintiffs Objection to Recommendation of Magistrate Judge 106 is hereby OVERRULED, Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 84 is GRANTED, and a final judgment consistent with this Order shall be entered. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 10/21/08. (PG)
|
|
Filing
105
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 84 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants. Any objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation shall be filed with the Clerk in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and failure to file timely objections within the ten days after service shall constitute a waiver of subsequent review absent a showing of good cause for such failure. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 9/24/08. (TMA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: COOK v. FARMERS' INSURANCE GROUP, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
