HUGHES v. SUSQUEHANNA INDIANAPOLIS,
Plaintiff: LISA E. HUGHES
Defendant: INDIANAPOLIS RADIO LICENSE CO.
Case Number: 1:2007cv00081
Filed: January 22, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
County: Marion
Presiding Judge: Tim A. Baker
Presiding Judge: John Daniel Tinder
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 131 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 92 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 98 Motion in Limine (S.O.). Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 1/30/09. (MAC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HUGHES v. SUSQUEHANNA INDIANAPOLIS,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: INDIANAPOLIS RADIO LICENSE CO.
Represented By: Gregory C. Brubaker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LISA E. HUGHES
Represented By: Kimberly Denise Jeselskis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?