PIEL v. KOKOMO AUTO WORLD, INC.
Plaintiff: SAMANTHA PIEL
Defendant: KOKOMO AUTO WORLD, INC.
Case Number: 1:2007cv00166
Filed: February 6, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
County: Howard
Presiding Judge: William T. Lawrence
Presiding Judge: John Daniel Tinder
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 14, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER granting in part and denying in part defendant's 40 Motion for Summary Judgment. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Larry J. McKinney on 11/14/08. (GJQ)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PIEL v. KOKOMO AUTO WORLD, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SAMANTHA PIEL
Represented By: Nathan D. Foushee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KOKOMO AUTO WORLD, INC.
Represented By: Stephen J. Peters
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?