LUEDIKE et al v. SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION
ERIC LUEDIKE, HEATHER WARD, TAMI SWEARINGEN, DONALD TRAINER, III, DEBRA HARTLEY, AUDI SANDERS and ERIC BENDER |
SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION |
1:2007cv01082 |
August 23, 2007 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Marion |
William T. Lawrence |
Larry J. McKinney |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 253 ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION - Plaintiffs request that the Court set this issue for oral argument if the Court is not satisfied with the detail in the billing statements included in the brief supporting their Motion to Reconsi der Attorney Fees Awarded. The Court is satisfied in its ability to evaluate the motion on the brief and, accordingly, DENIES Plaintiffs' request for oral argument. Further, the Court has considered Plaintiffs' arguments and for the reasons stated within the Order, DENIES Plaintiffs' 250 motion. Signed by Judge Larry J. McKinney on 5/3/2011. (REO) |
Filing 249 CLOSED JUDGMENT - Through an order dated March 4, 2009 131 , the Court granted defendant's Motion to Dismiss plaintiffs', Eric Luedike, Heather Ward, Donald Trainer, III, Debra Hartley, and Eric Bender, Indiana Wage Claim Statute claim for vacation/PTO pay. Through an order dated January 19, 2010 160 , the Court granted defendant's, Sprint Nextel Corporation, Motion for Summary Judgment for Sprint Nextel Corporation and against plaintiffs, Eric Luedike, Donald Trainer, III, Debra Hartley and Eric Bender regarding their Indiana Wage Claim Statute claims for commission/incentive compensation pay. Judgment is entered accordingly. Signed by Judge Larry J. McKinney on 4/4/2011.(REO) |
Filing 195 ORDER granting 184 Motion to Dismiss - the Court GRANTS defendants', Sprint United Management Company and Nextel Retail Stores, LLC, Motion for Dismissal. Plaintiffs shall have fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order to file a petition for attorney's fees and costs. Signed by Judge Larry J. McKinney on 7/12/2010. (REO) |
Filing 167 ORDER on Plaintiffs' Motion to Reconsider - Court GRANTS in part Plaintiffs' Motion to Reconsider to the extent the Court reconsiders the evidence regarding boost payments. However, because the undisputed evidence demonstrates that the boos t payments do not constitute "wages" under the Indiana Wage Payment Statute, Summary Judgment Order at 11, Sprint's Motion for Summary Judgment related to the boost payments remains GRANTED. The Court's January 19, 2010, Order (Dkt. No. 160 ) is hereby AMENDED as set forth in this Order. Signed by Judge Larry J. McKinney on 2/11/2010. (TRG) |
Filing 160 ***THIS ORDER IS AMENDED - SEE ORDER 167 *** ORDER on Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment - Defendant's, Sprint Nextel Corporation, Motions for Summary Judgment regarding plaintiffs, Eric Luedike, Donald Trainer, III, Debra Hartley, a nd Eric Bender (Dkt. Nos. 100 and 106 ), are GRANTED. The defendant's, Sprint Nextel Corporation, Motion for Summary Judgment regarding plaintiff, Heather Ward (Dkt. No. 103 ), is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Court hereby SETS this matter for a Status Conference on Friday, January 29, 2010, at 2:00 p.m., Room 204, Birch Bayh Federal Building and United States Courthouse. Signed by Judge Larry J. McKinney on 1/19/2010.(TRG) Modified on 2/12/2010 (TRG). |
Filing 133 ORDER granting 61 defendants' Motion to Dismiss and denying 129 plaintiffs' Motion to Stay. See Order for details. Plaintiffs shall have 30 days from the date of this Order to file responses to defendants' motions for summary judgment. Signed by Judge Larry J. McKinney on 3/4/2009. (GJQ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.