WALKER et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
| DAVID P. WALKER and RONDA J. WALKER |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 1:2007cv01609 |
| December 14, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Marion |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| William T. Lawrence |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Tort Claim |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
229
ENTRY ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION: Having GRANTED SAIC's Motion for Reconsideration 220 and reconsidered its prior ruling, the Court now reaffirms its conclusion that SAIC's Motions for Summary Judgment (Docket Nos. 156 & 162) were properly DENIED ***SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 3/14/2011. (DWH)
|
|
Filing
214
ENTRY ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT: For the foregoing reasons, the Plaintiffs' Partial Motion for Summary Judgment 150 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. SAIC's Motion for Summary Judgment against David Walker 156 is DENIED as is SAIC's Motion for Summary Judgment against Ronda Walker 162 . James McNair's Motion for Summary Judgment 164 , William Paynes Motion for Summary Judgment 179 , and Terry Griffith's Motion for Summary Judgment 200 are also all DE NIED. The Plaintiffs' motion Docket No. 205 is DENIED. Defendant Griffith sought leave to file his summary judgment motion (Docket No. 201) in September is DENIED AS MOOT ***SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 12/15/2010. (DWH)
|
|
Filing
119
ENTRY ON MOTION FOR RULE 54(b) CERTIFICATION: The Court, being duly advised, DENIES the motion 111 for the reasons set forth below **SEE ENTRY**. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 10/5/2009. (DWH)
|
|
Filing
107
ENTRY ON THE UNITED STATES' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. This cause is before the Court on a motion filed by the United States entitled Renewed and Supplemental Motion to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment (dkt. 56), which the Court has treated as a motion for summary judgment, and two related Motions to Strike (dkt. nos. 74 and 75). For the reasons discussed herein, the Court GRANTS the USA's Motion for Summary Judgment and DENIES the Plaintiffs' motions to strike. Accordingly, the USA's motion for summary judgment with regard to all of Plaintiffs' claims against it is GRANTED. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 7/6/2009. (LBK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
