HAYES v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
| PHILLIP HAYES |
| CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, C. MAHER, F. VANEK and C. ANDERSON |
| 1:2008cv00006 |
| January 3, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Marion |
| David Frank Hamilton |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
ENTRY DISCUSSING 34 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted as to (1) the claims against the City, (2) the claims against the police officers in their official capacities, and (3) the cl aim for unreasonable seizure consisting of the police chase and a lawful basis for Hayes' arrest. The claim which remains for resolution is the Fourth Amendment claim of use of excessive force against Hayes in the course of or immediately after his arrest. No partial final judgment shall issue at this time as to the claims resolved in this Entry. Signed by Judge David Frank Hamilton on 3/16/2009. c/m. (LBK)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER granting motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 42 and denying 41 motion for appointment of counsel. See Entry for particulars. Signed by Judge David Frank Hamilton on 11/3/2008. c/m. (LBK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
