JOHNSON v. HIX WRECKER SERVICE, INC. et al
| BOBBY J. JOHNSON, JR. |
| HIX WRECKER SERVICE, INC., JAMES HIX, OVA HIX and GAIL NEAL |
| 1:2008cv00050 |
| January 14, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Marion |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
183
ENTRY ON POST-TRIAL MOTIONS. (See Entry) Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 1/14/2013. (TMA)
|
|
Filing
163
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOLLOWING TRIAL: For the reasons set forth above, the Court determines that Johnson was subject to the motor carrier exemption to the FLSA during his employment at HWS. Accordingly, the overtime provisions of the FLSA were inapplicable to Johnson. Judgment will be entered in favor of the Defendants on Johnson's FLSA claim, which is the only claim that remains in this case ***SEE FINDINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 9/26/2012.(DW)
|
|
Filing
112
ENTRY ON MOTION TO RECONSIDER: For the reasons set forth above, the Defendants' motion to reconsider is DENIED. Defense counsel Russell W. Poole remains under an order to pay sanctions to the Plaintiff in the amount of $4,475.00. If it has not been made already, payment shall be made within 14 days of the date of this Entry **SEE ENTRY**. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 9/29/2009. (DWH)
|
|
Filing
97
ENTRY REGARDING REMAINING ISSUES: DENIED Motion to Reconsider [94). Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment 85 is DENIED IN PART with regard to his FLSA claims. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the Order to Show Cause, summary judgment is GRANT ED in favor of the Defendants on Johnson's minimum wage claim pursuant to the FLSA. Accordingly, defense counsel Russell W. Poole is ORDERED to pay sanctions to Johnson in the amount of $4,475.00. Payment shall be made within 60 days of the date of this Entry **SEE ENTRY**. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 7/14/2009.(DWH)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER ON MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT: For the reasons set forth above, the Court determines that Johnson was subject to the motor carrier exemption to the FLSA during his employment at HWS. Accordingly, Defendants are entitled to summary judgment on Johnsons claim for overtime pay under the FLSA, and their motion for partial summary judgment therefore is GRANTED **SEE ORDER**. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 6/18/2009.(DWH)
|
|
Filing
80
ENTRY granting Pltf's 62 Motion for Reconsideration. Plaintiff shall respond to the Defendants' motions for summary judgment by no later than April 30, 2009; the Defendants shall file their reply brief within 15 days thereafter. Neither party shall anticipate that a motion for extension of these deadlines will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances (see Entry for other details). Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 3/24/2009. (SWM)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER ON MOTIONS TO STRIKE AND MOTION TO STAY: DENIED 45 Motion to Strike; DENIED 48 Motion to Strike ; DENIED 56 Motion to Stay. The Plaintiff shall file his responses to both motions for summary judgment within 21 days of the date of this Entry. (SEE ORDER) Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 2/12/2009. (DWH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
