VAN SLYKE v. LONG TERM DISABILITY COVERAGE FOR ALL EMPLOYEES OF COMFORT SYSTEMS, USA, INC.
| PAULA VAN SLYKE |
| LONG TERM DISABILITY COVERAGE FOR ALL EMPLOYEES OF COMFORT SYSTEMS, USA, INC. |
| 1:2008cv00160 |
| February 7, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. Office |
| Marion |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| William T. Lawrence |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: VAN SLYKE v. LONG TERM DISABILITY COVERAGE FOR ALL EMPLOYEES OF COMFORT SYSTEMS, USA, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: PAULA VAN SLYKE | |
| Represented By: | Melissa A. Davidson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: LONG TERM DISABILITY COVERAGE FOR ALL EMPLOYEES OF COMFORT SYSTEMS, USA, INC. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
