SIERRA CLUB v. DUKE ENERGY INDIANA, INC. et al
Plaintiff: SIERRA CLUB
Defendant: DUKE ENERGY INDIANA, INC., CINERGY CORP., CINERGY PSI, INC., PSI ENERGY, INC. and CINERGY POWER GENERATION SERVICES, LLC
Case Number: 1:2008cv00437
Filed: April 3, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Environmental Matters Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Tim A. Baker
Presiding Judge: Sarah Evans Barker
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:7604 Clear Air Act (Emission Standards)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 20, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 117 AMENDED ORDER granting 64 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment staying entry of final judgment pending the conclusion of an appeal in a related case before the seventh circuit. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 9/20/2010. (CKM)
September 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 116 ORDER granting 70 Motion for Summary Judgment and staying entry of final judgment pending the conclusion of an appeal in a related case before the seventh circuit; denying as moot 81 Motion; granting 106 Motion (S.O.). Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 9/14/2010. (CKM)
March 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 99 ORDER granting plaintiff's First 60 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (S.O.). Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 3/30/2010. (MAC)
February 11, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER denying 18 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 2/11/2009. (CBU)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SIERRA CLUB v. DUKE ENERGY INDIANA, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SIERRA CLUB
Represented By: David C. Bender
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DUKE ENERGY INDIANA, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CINERGY CORP.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CINERGY PSI, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PSI ENERGY, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CINERGY POWER GENERATION SERVICES, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?