COLLINS v. PFIZER, INC.
Plaintiff: LINDA COLLINS
Defendant: PFIZER, INC.
Case Number: 1:2008cv00888
Filed: July 2, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability Office
County: Grant
Presiding Judge: David Frank Hamilton
Presiding Judge: Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 17 Pfizer's Partial Motion to Dismiss. The motion is granted with respect to the prayer for attorney fees and denied in all other respects addressed to the Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge David Frank Hamilton on 1/20/2009. (LBK)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: COLLINS v. PFIZER, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LINDA COLLINS
Represented By: William E. Winingham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PFIZER, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?