OSBORN v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER KOZIATEK-BLUM et al
| RONALD OSBORN |
| CORRECTIONAL OFFICER KOZIATEK-BLUM, CORRECTIONAL CASE MANAGER GINGER DAVIS and COUNSELOR PHILLIP ZELLERS |
| 1:2008cv00916 |
| July 8, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Perry |
| Tim A. Baker |
| William T. Lawrence |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
ENTRY and Notice: The materials filed by the plaintiff on April 7, 2010, in opposition to defendant Zellers' motion for summary judgment are of no effect. Thus, even if these materials had been received prior to the deadline, or had been received prior to the ruling on the motion for summary judgment, or even if considered now in some substantive fashion, the court's ruling would be no different **SEE ENTRY**. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 4/9/2010.(DWH)
|
|
Filing
58
Entry Discussing Motion for Summary Judgment: GRANTED 50 Motion for Summary Judgment. The resolution of the claim against Counselor Zellers resolves all claims against all parties. Judgment consistent with this Entry and with the Entry of August 24, 2009, shall now issue **SEE ENTRY**. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 4/7/2010. (DWH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
