RODRIGUEZ v. WESTSIDE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Plaintiff: PATRICIA RODRIGUEZ
Defendant: WESTSIDE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Case Number: 1:2008cv00962
Filed: July 18, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Hancock
Presiding Judge: Tim A. Baker
Presiding Judge: David Frank Hamilton
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 15, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER denying 9 Motion to Dismiss and 22 Renewed Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge David Frank Hamilton on 12/15/08. (WJC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: RODRIGUEZ v. WESTSIDE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PATRICIA RODRIGUEZ
Represented By: Ryan Patrick Sink
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WESTSIDE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Represented By: Dorothy D. Parson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?