REMY, INC. v. TECNOMATIC S.P.A.
Plaintiff: REMY, INC.
Defendant: TECNOMATIC S.P.A.
Case Number: 1:2008cv01227
Filed: September 12, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: Madison
Presiding Judge: Sarah Evans Barker
Presiding Judge: Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 18, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER denying 74 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. For the reasons stated herein, Defendants Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Docket No. 74] DENIED. (S.O.). Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 10/18/2010. (CKM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: REMY, INC. v. TECNOMATIC S.P.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: REMY, INC.
Represented By: Joseph H. Yeager, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TECNOMATIC S.P.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?