WALTON et al v. HYATT & ROSENBAUM, P.A. et al
| DEBORAH WALTON and MARGARET WALTON |
| HYATT & ROSENBAUM, P.A., STEPHEN HYATT and WILLIAM T. ROSENBAUM |
| 1:2008cv01275 |
| September 23, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Other Statutory Actions Office |
| Hamilton |
| Tim A. Baker |
| David Frank Hamilton |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER following 1/5/2010 Hearing on attorneys fees; as to plaintiff Deborah Walton, Stephen Hyatts fee petition is granted. Consistent with this ruling, (1) Stephen Hyatt shall recover his costs in this action in the amount of $288.16, and (2) S tephen Hyatt shall recover his attorney fees in the amount of $9830.50. In addition, the Rosenbaum defendants fee petition is granted, and consistent with this ruling, (1) the Rosenbaum defendants shall recover their costs in this action in the amount of $827.53, and (2) the Rosenbaum defendants shall recover their attorneys fees in the amount of $19,460.50 from Deborah Walton. Final judgment consistent with this ruling and the Entry of September 18, 2009, shall now enter (S.O.). Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 1/25/2010.(MAC)
|
|
Filing
40
ENTRY GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS. For the reasons set forth herein, the motions to dismiss (dkts 12 and 14) and the request for attorney's fees (dkt 12) are GRANTED. The defendants shall submit a written fee p etition no later than 10/12/09, along with supporting affidavit(s) and record. These may also include any request for costs. Defendant Stephen Hyatt shall have through 10/12/09 in which to file a motion for attorney's fees and costs pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1692k(a)(3). The Waltons shall have through 10/26/09 in which to file an objection or other response to both Defendant Hyatt & Rosenbaum, P.A. and William T. Rosenbaum's written fee petition and to Defendant Stephen Hyatt' s motion for attorney's fees and fee petition. Unless a party requests in writing an evidentiary hearing on the amount of the fee petition, the court will decide the amount of the fee award based only on the written submissions. The plaintiff& #039;s objections to the defendants' request for documents (dkt 39) is denied as moot. Although the motions to dismiss have now been resolved, the court does not enter final judgment at this time. It is anticipated that final judgment will be entered once all petitions for attorneys' fees and costs have been resolved. Signed by Judge David Frank Hamilton on 9/18/2009. c/m. (LBK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
