BOWERSOCK et al v. DAVOL, INC. et al
| BOBBY DON BOWERSOCK, CHARLOTTE ROBINSON and MARK BOWERSOCK |
| DAVOL, INC. and C.R. BARD, INC. |
| 1:2008cv01313 |
| September 30, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Greene |
| Tim A. Baker |
| Larry J. McKinney |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
82
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 77 Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment - Plaintiffs have failed to establish that the Court committed a manifest error of law or fact in granting summary judgment on behalf of Bard. Therefore, Plaintiffs' Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (Dkt. 77 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Larry J. McKinney on 4/25/2017. (JKS)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - Defendants', Davl, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc., Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 30), is GRANTED. Defendants', Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc., Motions in Limine to exclude the testi mony of Dr. Stephen Ferzoco (Dkt. 33) and Dr. William A. Hyman (Dkt. 39), as well as the Motion in Limine to limit the testimony of Dr. Roland Kohr (Dkt. 37), are GRANTED. The Court will enter judgment accordingly. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Larry J. McKinney on 2/23/2017. (LDH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
