ELI LILLY AND COMPANY v. WOCKHARDT LIMITED et al
| ELI LILLY AND COMPANY |
| WOCKHARDT LIMITED and WOCKHARDT USA, INC. |
| 1:2008cv01547 |
| November 14, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Patent Office |
| Marion |
| Tim A. Baker |
| William T. Lawrence |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 35:271 Patent Infringement |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
354
ORDER on Wockhardt Limited's Motion for Leave to Amend and Eli Lilly and Company's Motion to Compel. Wockhardt's 262 Motion for Leave to File a Third Amended Answer and Counterclaims is GRANTED, and its proposed Third Amended Answer and Counterclaims [Docket No. 263-1] shall be deemed timely filed as of the date of this order. The Court also grants Lilly's 288 Motion to Compel to the extent that Wockhardt shall supplement its discovery responses as indicated within fourt een days. If Lilly still believes that Wockhardt's answers are inadequate, it shall advise Wockhardt of its concerns and, if necessary, shall contact the Magistrate Judge to schedule a hearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 12/30/2010. (JD)
|
|
Filing
259
ORDER: On May 27, 2010, the Court ordered Defendant Wockhardt Limited to show cause why parts of its response and opposition to Lilly's motion to compel discovery and supporting exhibits should remain under seal. [Docket No. 230.] Wockhardt adm its that Exhibits 1, 2, 5,and 7 should be unsealed but requests permission to redact its response and allow Exhibits 3, 4,6, and 8 to remain under seal. [Docket No. 254.] After reviewing Wockhardt's response and exhibits, the Court orders as follows (see Order). Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 7/20/2010.(SWM)
|
|
Filing
252
ORDER granting IN PART Wockhardt's 222 Supplemental Motion to Compel; granting Wockhardt's 208 Motion for Leave to Amend First Amended Answer and Counterclaims; granting IN PART Wockhardt's 210 Motion to Compel (see Order for details). The Court extends the liability discovery deadline until 8/31/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 6/22/2010. (SWM)
|
|
Filing
230
ORDER granting in part 186 Motion to Compel. Wockhardt shall supplement its discovery responses within 28 days of this order as explained in this order. Additionally Wockhardt shall show cause within 28 days why its response and exhibits should remain sealed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 5/27/2010. (CBU)
|
|
Filing
120
ENTRY REGARDING PENDING MOTIONS: For the reasons discussed above, Lilly's motions to amend (dkt. nos. 80 and 85) are GRANTED and Lilly's amended complaints (attached as Exhibit 1 to each motion) are deemed filed as of this date. The Defendants' motions for judgment on the pleading (dkt. nos. 32 and 42) and motion to strike (dkt. no. 44) are DENIED AS MOOT **SEE ENTRY**. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 9/18/2009.(DWH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
