HARRISON v. ASTRUE
Plaintiff: JOSEPH B. HARRISON, JR.
Defendant: COMMISSIONER MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Case Number: 1:2008cv01736
Filed: December 30, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: E Office
County: Madison
Presiding Judge: Debra McVicker Lynch
Presiding Judge: Larry J. McKinney
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: E
Jury Demanded By: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 10, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ENTRY ON JUDICIAL REVIEW - The final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security in this case is AFFIRMED. Final judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge Larry J. McKinney on 3/10/2010.(TRG)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HARRISON v. ASTRUE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOSEPH B. HARRISON, JR.
Represented By: Irma Hampton Nave
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COMMISSIONER MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Represented By: Thomas E. Kieper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?