HALL v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, et. al.

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Indiana Southern District HALL v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, et. al.

HALL v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, et. al.

Plaintiff:	LONNIE R. HALL
Defendant:	CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, et. al.
Case Number:	1:2009cv00082
Filed:	January 27, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Civil Rights: Other Office
County:	Madison
Presiding Judge:	David Frank Hamilton
Presiding Judge:	Debra McVicker Lynch
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 4, 2009	Filing 27 ORDER granting 21 Defendants Mary Mansfield, Dr. Solotkin, Dr. Dobryns, and Correctional Medical Services' ("medical defendants") Motion to Dismiss. For the reasons discussed herein, Hall's complaint fails to state a claim agai nst the medical defendants insofar as the complaint invokes 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and to that extent, the motion to dismiss is granted. If an amended complaint is filed, plaintiff should take care to note that "[t]hreadbare recitals of the ele ments of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice." Medical defendants' motion to dismiss also challenges the sufficiency of the pendent claims under Indiana State law. No partial final judgment shall issue at this time as to the claim resolved in this Order. See Order for further particulars. Signed by Judge David Frank Hamilton on 9/4/2009. c/m. (LBK)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 4, 2009

Filing 27 ORDER granting 21 Defendants Mary Mansfield, Dr. Solotkin, Dr. Dobryns, and Correctional Medical Services' ("medical defendants") Motion to Dismiss. For the reasons discussed herein, Hall's complaint fails to state a claim agai nst the medical defendants insofar as the complaint invokes 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and to that extent, the motion to dismiss is granted. If an amended complaint is filed, plaintiff should take care to note that "[t]hreadbare recitals of the ele ments of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice." Medical defendants' motion to dismiss also challenges the sufficiency of the pendent claims under Indiana State law. No partial final judgment shall issue at this time as to the claim resolved in this Order. See Order for further particulars. Signed by Judge David Frank Hamilton on 9/4/2009. c/m. (LBK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HALL v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, et. al.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: LONNIE R. HALL
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, et. al.
Represented By:	Akia Haynes
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?